Shabdkosh®

Language Support Forums | भाषा सहयोग मंच

Translate into english

26 May 2015 15:38


26 May 2015 15:38
Nida25
Member
26 May 2015 15:38

agar yeh problem is product mein hoty, to yeh is product mein bhe present hoty.

if this problem had been present in this product then this would have present in this product too.


26 May 2015 17:40
"Sakshi"
Moderator
26 May 2015 17:40

If there was any problem in this product, then the same problem would be present in this product also.


26 May 2015 19:07
Nida25
Member
26 May 2015 19:07

Mam sakshi yeh jo sentence hai imagination wala hai aur I think yaha   had + third form , would + have + third form use ho ga.  please correct me If I say worng because yaha use huwa “hoty” or “hota”


26 May 2015 20:57
"Sakshi"
Moderator
26 May 2015 20:57

If there had been any problem in this product, then the same problem would have arisen in this product also.
—Agar is product me koi problem hui hoti to vahi problem is product me bhi ho gayi hoti.

If there was any problem in this product, then the same problem would be present in this product also.
—Agar is product me koi problem thi to is product me bhi hoti.


27 May 2015 12:33
Nida25
Member
27 May 2015 12:33

mam sakshi

would be and would have + 3rd form (in dono ko sentence mein identity kaisay karay gay)

agar hindi sentence mein yeh ho to would be use karay gay aur agar would have 3rd form hoto yeh use karay gay

kyu k dono k end mein hoti use ho raha hai but main difference kiya hai


27 May 2015 15:33
"Sakshi"
Moderator
27 May 2015 15:33

Correct, but ‘would have +v3’ means ‘Ho Gaya Hota/Ho Gayi Hoti.


27 May 2015 16:36
Nida25
Member
27 May 2015 16:36

thanks aur “huwe hoty”  bhe would have 3rd hai ya nahee


27 May 2015 21:34
"Sakshi"
Moderator
27 May 2015 21:34

Hui hoti = ho gayi hoti.